Ato the phrase appeal not provided for by law as both a nonexistent appeal but also an appeal with a name different from the one expressly provided for by law with possible consequences on the content of the request. The formulation of such an appeal can be determined on the one hand by the inaccurate mention in the content of the decision but also on the other hand as in the present case by considerations related exclusively to the procedural behavior of the party. HIGH COURT OF CASSATION AND JUSTICE In the name of the law D E C I D E Admits the appeal in the interest of the law formulated by the Board of Directors of the.
Braov Court of Appeal and consequently determines that The provisions Country Email List of art. para. of the Code of Civil Procedure are not applicable if the party exercises an appeal not provided for by law different from the one correctly mentioned in the operative part of the contested decision. not provided for by law different from the one correctly mentioned in the operative part of the contested decision the court of judicial control will reject as inadmissible the appeal not provided for by law according to art. para. of the Civil Procedure Code to the extent that it cannot be qualified by applying the provisions of art. related to art. para. of the.
Civil Procedure Code. Mandatory according to the provisions of art. para. of the Civil Procedure Code. Pronounced in public session today October . THE PRESIDENT OF THE HIGH COURT OF CASSATION AND JUSTICE IULIA CRISTINA TARCEA Assistant Magistrate Elena Adriana Stamatescu Leave a reply Your email address will not be published. Mandatory fields are marked with Comment Name Email Site web.